Int J Urban Reg Res 29(40):945–959Ĭabigon JV (2006) Cities in globalization. Appl Geogr 20(1):43–63īenton-Short L, Price MD, Friedman S (2005) Globalization from below: the ranking of global immigrant cities. Wiley, London/New Yorkīeaverstock JV, Smith RG, Taylor PJ, Walker DRF, Lorimer H (2000) Globalization and world cities: some measurement methodologies.

Urban Stud 47(9):1899–1923Īppadurai A (1990) Disjuncture and difference in the global economy. Oxford University Press, New YorkĪlderson AS, Beckfield J, Sprague-Jones J (2010) Intercity relations and globalization: the evolution of the global urban hierarchy, 1981–2007. Finally, these city-regions are shown to be strong economic leaders in part because they are able to change-although the authors reveal that pragmatism and piecemeal policy solutions can still prevail.Abrahamson M (2004) Global cities. Policy-making is often selective, the authors find, and governments are more responsive to economic exigencies than to social or environmental needs.

The second theme is how the city-regions fight to manage powerful political biases. The first is the continuing struggle for governability in the midst of regional governmental fragmentation. Three critical themes frame Struggling Giants. This volume analyzes the thorniest issues these sprawling city-regions have faced, including ameliorating social problems through public policies, the effect of globalization on local governance, and the relationships between local, regional, and national institutions.

Struggling Giants examines the transformation of four of the most significant metropolises: London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo. Throughout the past thirty years a small number of city-regions have achieved unprecedented global status in the world economy while undergoing radical changes.

Global city regions: quizlet urp